Well, at least he wins the Atchley home phone call record of the Presidential candidates.

• 5 total calls from Obama or supporters
• 3 total calls from Ron Paul or supporters
• 1 call from Clinton

I spoke with a live person from Obama and Ron Paul campaigns, or at least a supporter cold calling.

I’m still holding out for a general election Mormon showdown between Mitt Romney and Harry Reid in 2016.

Tags: clinton,election2008,obama,Ron Paul
Categories: BJ, Philosophy etc
4 Comments »

What a unique experience during the presidential primary cycle. Texas matters. I received two phone calls over the weekend asking me to vote for their candidate, one for Obama and one for Ron Paul. I’ve already “thrown my vote away,” for Ron Paul, but every time I can push the school of thought that many of Ron Paul’s views represent I’ll continue to vote outside of the frontrunners or the major parties.

Obama is going to win the Democratic primary and the election. There’s too much of a groundswell surrounding him for there to be any other outcome. I think he’ll do well to restore the US in the eyes of the rest of the world. His largely globalist view of world politics could push us more to the forefront in the various organizations we participate in, but he’s an unknown quantity in economic matters. He’s pro-consumer in his legislative rhetoric, but not damning enough towards big business to stifle. If he looked like he would cut corporate subsidy, I’d start to support him more heavily, but his rhetoric is too generic for me to know what to think. He has softened on gun control. His energy policy has a good background but his current rhetoric reflects the current chicken little viewpoint on greenhouse gasses. His healthcare viewpoints are sound as they rely on individual subsidy and avoid community rating and mandating coverage limits. I hope he remembers that younger voters are voting him in when it comes time to start pushing healthcare reform. His foreign policy seems to be UN based. I dunno. I can always “Hope” that the huge cavern of possible policy stances his rhetoric could encompass leans towards liberty over socialism.

Here’s a quote from David Boaz of the Cato institute.

The difference between libertarianism and socialism is that libertarians will tolerate the existence of a socialist community, but socialists can’t tolerate a libertarian community.

Tags: election2008,obama,politics,Ron Paul
Categories: BJ, Philosophy etc
1 Comment »

I know I had mentioned that I wouldn’t discuss Ron Paul much more, but a huge controversy over his background came up again. It’s an issue I had previously written about here. This is specifically about the newsletters that had been penned in between the period of his Libertarian run for president and his current run as a Republican congressman. They came to the forefront on the day of New Hampshire primaries based on a hit piece by a writer over at The New Republic. Even if not actually penned by Dr. Paul there’s some obvious white nationalist thought published under his name during that time period. Please note these were also associated with a gold investment company that pushed it’s association with the aforementioned newsletters. Dr. Paul has not come forward with the name of the person/persons involved in the publication of the newsletters with these comments in them.

Some interesting things have happened since then though. Let me frame the implosion. There are two major institutions/think-tanks that push libertarian thought. One is the Cato Institute, and the other is the Ludwig von Mises Institute. Their respective online support comes in the form of Reason Magazine (of which I am a subscriber) for the Cato Institute (note: the Cato Institute has a larger influence on political thought) and LewRockwell.com for the Ludwig von Mises Institute. There had always seemed to be a rift between the two organizations, and I never knew why. Now I do (link to a long article at reason.com regarding authorship). Anyway, here’s a summation from a former Ron Paul staffer.

Dear Lew,

You have now had three opportunities –1996, 2001, and 2008 — to prove that you are a friend of Ron Paul and freedom, and you have failed to do so each time.

This week, for the third time, the puerile, racist, and completely un-Pauline comments that all informed people say you have caused to appear in Ron’s newsletters over the course of several years have become an issue in his campaign. This time the stakes are even higher than before. He is seeking nationwide office, the Republican nomination for President, and his campaign is attracting millions of supporters, not tens of thousands.

Three times you have failed to come forward and admit responsibility for and complicity in the scandals. You have allowed Ron to twist slowly in the wind. Because of your silence, Ron has been forced to issue repeated statements of denial, to answer repeated questions in multiple interviews, and to be embarrassed on national television. Your callous disregard for both Ron and his millions of supporters is unconscionable.

If you were Dr. Paul’s friend, or a friend of freedom, as you pretend to be, by now you would have stepped forward, assumed responsibility for those asinine and harmful comments, resigned from any connection to Ron or his campaign, and relieved Ron of the burden of having to repeatedly deny the charges of racism. But you have not done so, and so the scandal continues to detract from Ron’s message.

You know as well as I do that Ron does not have a racist bone in his body, yet those racist remarks went out under his name, not yours. Pretty clever. But now it’s time to man up, Lew. Admit your role, and exonerate Ron. You should have done it years ago.

John Robbins, Ph.D.
Chief of Staff
Dr. Ron Paul, 1981-1985

Regarding this news lewrockell.com is coming off of my links and bookmarks.

Tags: election2008,politics,Ron Paul
Categories: BJ, Philosophy etc
No Comments »